AQ1121 vs AQ1020: A Comprehensive Comparison of Underwater Propellers – Analysis of Thrust, FOC ESC Advantages and Application Scenarios

Posted by Fengyukun on

When choosing an underwater thruster, many users find themselves torn between the AQ1020 and its upgraded version, the AQ1121.

On the one hand, the AQ1020 delivers a thrust of up to 24 kg at 48V, which is even higher than the AQ1121’s 21 kg;
on the other hand, the AQ1121 is marketed as the ‘upgraded version’.

👉 So the question arises:
What exactly has been upgraded in the AQ1121? Is it worth choosing?

This article will help you fully understand the differences between the two by examining thrust, the control system (FOC), real-world user experience and application scenarios.

Product Overview

AQ1020 Underwater Thruster

The AQ1020 is a cost-effective, multi-purpose thruster:

24V → 10kg thrust
48V → 24kg thrust (high burst)
Built-in standard ESC

👉 Suitable for: kayaks / small boats / DIY projects / everyday use

AQ1121 Underwater Thruster (Upgraded Version)

The AQ1121 is a high-performance propeller designed to deliver stability and control:

Maximum thrust: 21 kg
Power: up to 2000 W
Built-in FOC ESC (upgraded core)

👉 Suitable for: extended operation / professional equipment / high-performance requirements

Key Specifications Comparison

Feature AQ1020 AQ1121
Voltage 24V / 48V 48V / 60V
Max Thrust 24kg (48V) 21kg
Power Moderate Up to 2000W
ESC Standard ESC FOC ESC (core advantage)
Control Feel Basic Ultra-smooth & precise
Positioning High thrust output Stable & efficient performance

 

The Real Upgrade: FOC Control System

Many users focus only on thrust—but the real difference comes from:
👉 Motor control technology

FOC vs Traditional ESC: A True Generational Upgrade

Aspect AQ1020 (Standard ESC) AQ1121 (FOC ESC)
Startup Noticeable jerk Ultra-smooth, no shock
Acceleration Step-like Linear and smooth
Noise Higher Significantly quieter
Precision Basic Excellent low-speed control
Efficiency Standard Higher efficiency, less power loss
Heat Higher Lower heat, more stable

 

Why is FOC more important for underwater propulsion systems?

Characteristics of the underwater environment:

High water resistance
Rapid changes in load
Frequent need for low-speed control
Long operating times

👉 These are precisely the scenarios where FOC excels:

✔ Smoother operation → No sudden surges
✔ More energy-efficient → Longer battery life
✔ More stable → Less prone to overheating
✔ More precise → Precise control even at low speeds

Scenario Comparison (Helping You Choose the Right One)

Scenario 1: Kayaking / Leisure Use

👉 Requirements:

Simple propulsion
Occasional use

✔ Recommended: AQ1020

Reasons:

Sufficient thrust
Lower cost

Scenario 2: Requires High Thrust (Carrying Passengers/Loads)

👉 Requirements:

High power
Fast propulsion

✔ Recommended:

For burst power → AQ1020 (48V 24kg)
For stability → AQ1121

Scenario 3: Long-Duration Operation / Cruising / Commercial Use

👉 Requirements:

Long operating hours
Stable and reliable

✔ Highly Recommended: AQ1121

Reasons:

FOC is more energy-efficient
Lower heat generation
Less prone to performance degradation

The difference between the AQ1020 and AQ1121 is not essentially one of ‘strength versus weakness’, but rather a difference in ‘positioning’:

AQ1020 → High thrust, excellent value for money, suitable for most users
AQ1121 → Advanced control, higher efficiency, suitable for professional requirements

👉 If you’re only looking at thrust, the AQ1020 is already very powerful
👉 If you’re seeking a superior experience and stability, the AQ1121 is the true upgrade

FAQ

1: Why does the AQ1121 have lower thrust despite being the upgraded version?

Because the upgrades focus on the control system (FOC) and efficiency, rather than simply increasing thrust.

2: What exactly does FOC do?

It delivers smoother operation, greater energy efficiency and enhanced stability, making it particularly suitable for prolonged use and precise control.

3: Which model is better suited for kayaks?

The AQ1020 is sufficient.

4: Which model is better suited for professional equipment?

The AQ1121 is more suitable.



Share this post



← Older Post Newer Post →


0 comments

Leave a comment